ADVANCES IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY FOR PECTUS EXCAVATUM: ENHANCING OUTCOMES AND PATIENT CARE.

Pectus excavatum, also called sunken chest, is the most common deformation of the sternum (90%). The deformation is caused by the depression of the sternum and costal cartilages, which causes reduction of the chest cavity and dysfunction of cardio-pulmonary systems in it. Sunken chest is more common in males than females, prevalence is 5/1. Most of the cases appear in the first year of life, however severity of the pathology is formed during puberty. Etiopathogenesis, genetic factors, and associated diseases of Pectus Excavatum are various and are still the subject of study. The manifestation of the disease is determined by the degree of chest deformation, which is calculated using the "Haller index". Providing that a high degree of deformation can lead to pathological functioning of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. The treatment of this condition is an urgent, complex, and developing issue. The main method of treatment for sunken chest is surgical intervention; However, in cases of mild degrees of the mentioned deformation, different approaches are used. Our goal is to discuss contrasting treatment techniques and present our improved repairing technique for sunken chest, which is performed in Georgia.

A Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Pectus Excavatum Repair Surgery with a Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Technique: Case Report.

Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is currently used for the repair of pectus excavatum. Analgesia after thoracic surgery can be provided with nerve blocks, intravenous drugs, or neuraxial techniques. Serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block (SPSIPB) is a novel interfascial plane block and it is performed between the serratus posterior superior muscle and the intercostal muscles at the level of the second and third ribs. In this case, we present our successful analgesic experience with SPSIPB in a patient who underwent minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair with a VATS technique.

Sternal cleft and pectus excavatum: an overlooked congenital association?

BACKGROUND: Sternal cleft (SC), a rare thoracic malformation, is associated with pectus excavatum (PE) in 2.6-5% of cases. It remains unclear if these conditions are congenitally linked or if SC repair triggers PE. To investigate the potential higher frequency of PE in SC cases, we conducted a retrospective study of our SC patients. METHODS: We assessed PE incidence, progression, and management in SC patients treated at our institute from 2006 to 2022. When available, we collected pre-SC repair CT scan data, calculating the Haller Index (HI) and Correction Index (CI) and compared them to a selected control group. RESULTS: Among 8 SC patients, 7 had concomitant PE (87.5%), varying in severity. PE management ranged from observation to thoracoplasty, depending on its degree. We observed a significant pre-operative CI difference between SC and control group patients (p < 0.00001). In the last two SC repair cases, we attempted concurrent PE prevention or treatment. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest an underestimated association between PE and SC in the existing literature. SC patients may exhibit a predisposition to PE from birth, which may become more apparent with growth after SC repair. Consequently, PE prevention or treatment should be considered during SC repair procedures.

(F)utility of preoperative pulmonary function testing in pectus excavatum to assess severity.

PURPOSE: The utility of pulmonary function testing (PFT) in pectus excavatum (PE) has been subject to debate. Although some evidence shows improvement from preoperative to postoperative values, the clinical significance is uncertain. A high failure-to-completion rate for operative PFT (48%) was identified in our large institutional cohort. With such a high non-completion rate, we questioned the overall utility of PFT in the preoperative assessment of PE and sought to evaluate if other measures of PE severity or cardiopulmonary function could explain this finding. METHODS: Demographics, clinical findings, and results from cardiac MRI, PFT (spirometry and plethysmography), and cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPET) were reviewed in 270 patients with PE evaluated preoperatively between 2015 and 2018. Regression modeling was used to measure associations between PFT completion and cardiopulmonary function. RESULTS: There were no differences in demographics, symptoms, connective tissue disorders, or multiple indices of pectus severity and cardiac deformation in PFT completers versus non-completers. While regression analysis revealed higher RVEF, LVEF, and LVEF-Z scores, lower RV-ESV/BSA, LV-ESV/BSA, and LV-ESV/BSA-Z scores, and abnormal breathing reserve in PFT completers vs. non-completers, these findings were not consistent across continuous and binary analyses. CONCLUSIONS: We found that PFT completers were not significantly different from non-completers in most structural and functional measures of pectus deformity and cardiopulmonary function. Inability to complete PFT is not an indicator of pectus severity.

Complicaciones tras retirada de barra de Nussen pectus excavatum. Análisis y propuesta de unprotocolo de seguridad / Complications after Nuss bar removal procedure for pectus excavatum. Analysis and proposal of a safety protocol

Objetivo: La retirada de la barra de Nuss puede provocar diversascomplicaciones, algunas leves y otras potencialmente mortales. Su incidencia puede verse reducida con una preparación quirúrgica adecuaday siguiendo ciertos pasos de seguridad. El presente estudio tiene porobjeto analizar nuestra experiencia con las complicaciones acontecidasdurante la retirada de la barra, así como nuestro protocolo de seguridadpara la prevención y el manejo de dichas complicaciones.Material y métodos:Estudio de cohortes observacional llevado acabo a partir del análisis retrospectivo de todos los pacientes sometidos acirugía de retirada de barra de Nuss entre noviembre de 2013 y marzo de2022 en un hospital universitario. Se analizaron las siguientes variables:demografía de los pacientes, presencia de comorbilidades, tiempo desdela colocación de la barra hasta su retirada, y complicaciones operatoriasy postoperatorias. El estudio se realizó conforme a las directrices de laPROCESS Guideline. Resultados: Se incluyó a 40 pacientes, 37 de ellos varones. En 17pacientes se retiró una barra, y en 22, dos. La edad media en el momento de la cirugía fue de 17,5 años (percentil 25-75%: 16,75 - 19,25).El tiempo transcurrido desde la colocación hasta la retirada fue de 26meses (percentil 25-75%: 23,75 - 30,25). Se registraron 10 complicaciones en 9 pacientes (22,5%), 6 de clase I según la clasificación deClavien-Dindo (67%), 2 de clase II (22%), 1 de clase IIIb y 1 de claseIV. La complicación hemorrágica motivó la creación de un protocolo deseguridad para disminuir la incidencia de las complicaciones. Conclusión: La retirada de la barra de Nuss es un procedimientoseguro, habitualmente con escasas complicaciones, aunque en ocasionespueden ser graves. Para evitarlas, es importante contar con un protocoloque garantice la seguridad.(AU)

Objective: The Nuss bar removal procedure may bring about different complications. Some are mild while others can be life-threatening.An adequate surgery setup and the fulfilment of some security stepsmay reduce their incidence. This study aims to analyze our experiencewith the complications that occurred during bar removal and our safetyprotocol for the prevention and management of these complications.Materials and methods: Observational cohort study from a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent Nuss bar removalfrom November 2013 to March 2022 at a University hospital. Variablesanalyzed include patients’ demographics; presence of comorbidities;time elapsed from bar placement to removal, and the occurrence ofoperative and postoperative complications. Study written under the´PROCESS Guideline’. Results: Fourty (40) patients were included in the study; 37 weremale. One bar was removed in 17 patients and two in 22 patients. Medianage at surgery: 17.5 years (Percentile 25-75%: 16.75 - 19.25). Timeelapsed from placement to removal: 26 months (Percentile 25 - 75%:23.75 - 30.25). Complications: 10 in 9 patients (22.5%); 6 Clavien-Dindoclass I (67%); 2 class II (22%); 1 class IIIb, 1 class IV. The hemorrhagiccomplication motivated the development of a safety protocol to reduceincidence of complications. Conclusion: Nuss bar removal is a safe procedure with usuallyscant complications. Nonetheless, these may be serious sometimes. Toprevent them, a protocol for a safe procedure is important.(AU)

Complications after Nuss bar removal procedure for pectus excavatum. Analysis and proposal of a safety protocol. / Complicaciones tras retirada de barra de Nuss en pectus excavatum. Análisis y propuesta de un protocolo de seguridad.

OBJECTIVE: The Nuss bar removal procedure may bring about different complications. Some are mild while others can be life-threatening. An adequate surgery setup and the fulfilment of some security steps may reduce their incidence. This study aims to analyze our experience with the complications that occurred during bar removal and our safety protocol for the prevention and management of these complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Observational cohort study from a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent Nuss bar removal from November 2013 to March 2022 at a University hospital. Variables analyzed include patients' demographics; presence of comorbidities; time elapsed from bar placement to removal, and the occurrence of operative and postoperative complications. Study written under the 'PROCESS Guideline'. RESULTS: Fourty (40) patients were included in the study; 37 were male. One bar was removed in 17 patients and two in 22 patients. Median age at surgery: 17.5 years (Percentile 25-75%: 16.75-19.25). Time elapsed from placement to removal: 26 months (Percentile 25-75%: 23.75-30.25). Complications: 10 in 9 patients (22.5%); 6 Clavien-Dindo class I (67%); 2 class II (22%); 1 class IIIb, 1 class IV. The hemorrhagic complication motivated the development of a safety protocol to reduce incidence of complications. CONCLUSION: Nuss bar removal is a safe procedure with usually scant complications. Nonetheless, these may be serious sometimes. To prevent them, a protocol for a safe procedure is important.

OBJETIVO: La retirada de la barra de Nuss puede provocar diversas complicaciones, algunas leves y otras potencialmente mortales. Su incidencia puede verse reducida con una preparación quirúrgica adecuada y siguiendo ciertos pasos de seguridad. El presente estudio tiene por objeto analizar nuestra experiencia con las complicaciones acontecidas durante la retirada de la barra, así como nuestro protocolo de seguridad para la prevención y el manejo de dichas complicaciones. MATERIAL Y METODOS: Estudio de cohortes observacional llevado a cabo a partir del análisis retrospectivo de todos los pacientes sometidos a cirugía de retirada de barra de Nuss entre noviembre de 2013 y marzo de 2022 en un hospital universitario. Se analizaron las siguientes variables: demografía de los pacientes, presencia de comorbilidades, tiempo desde la colocación de la barra hasta su retirada, y complicaciones operatorias y postoperatorias. El estudio se realizó conforme a las directrices de la PROCESS Guideline. RESULTADOS: Se incluyó a 40 pacientes, 37 de ellos varones. En 17 pacientes se retiró una barra, y en 22, dos. La edad media en el momento de la cirugía fue de 17,5 años (percentil 25-75%: 16,75 - 19,25). El tiempo transcurrido desde la colocación hasta la retirada fue de 26 meses (percentil 25-75%: 23,75 - 30,25). Se registraron 10 complicaciones en 9 pacientes (22,5%), 6 de clase I según la clasificación de Clavien-Dindo (67%), 2 de clase II (22%), 1 de clase IIIb y 1 de clase IV. La complicación hemorrágica motivó la creación de un protocolo de seguridad para disminuir la incidencia de las complicaciones. CONCLUSION: La retirada de la barra de Nuss es un procedimiento seguro, habitualmente con escasas complicaciones, aunque en ocasiones pueden ser graves. Para evitarlas, es importante contar con un protocolo que garantice la seguridad.

Is pregnancy safe with an implanted pectus bar? An uneventful pregnancy with implanted pectus bar following correction of pectus excavatum.

Limited data are available on the implications on pregnancy following pectus bar implantation for correction of pectus excavatum (Nuss procedure), while the pectus bars are in place. Limited data is also available on long-term reproductive implications following pectus bar removal.Providers at times need to consider the necessity to counsel a woman desiring pectus excavatum correction and pregnancy whether to postpone one of the two in favour of the other.We present the case of a woman of reproductive age with an uneventful pregnancy and delivery while carrying an implanted pectus bar and subsequent uneventful pregnancy and delivery after bar removal.

Impact of delayed removal of pectus bar on outcomes following Nuss repair: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Usually, pectus bars are removed 3 years after the Nuss procedure in patients with pectus excavatum. However, the optimal timing for postoperative pectus bar removal remains undefined. Our study investigated the effects of delayed pectus bar removal after Nuss repairs. METHODS: Retrospective data were collected on patients who underwent Nuss procedures for pectus excavatum and had their bars removed from August 2014 to December 2020. Patients with correction periods > 3 years were divided into group A (< 6 years) and group B (≥ 6 years). Propensity score matching was used to compare complications and radiological outcomes associated with bar removal. RESULTS: Of the 542 patients who underwent bar removal, 451 (Group A: 419 patients, Group B: 32) had correction duration > 3 years. The average correction duration was 4.5 ± 1.4 years. After propensity score matching analysis, group B [median duration: 8.0 (6.0-16.2) years] exhibited significantly longer median operative times (85 vs. 55 min; P = 0.026), higher callus formation rates (68.8% vs. 46.9%; P = 0.029), and greater median intraoperative blood loss (35 vs. 10 mL; P = 0.017) than group A [median duration: 4.2 (3.0-5.9) years]. However, following bar removal, the groups showed no statistical differences in the surgical complication rates (group A: 6.3% vs. group B: 9.4%; P = 0.648) or median ratio of radiological improvement (an improvement on the Haller index on chest radiography; 21.0% vs. 22.2%; P = 0.308). CONCLUSIONS: Delaying pectus bar removal after Nuss repair presents certain challenges but does not compromise overall outcomes. These findings suggest that a longer correction period may be unnecessary. However, further multicenter studies with long-term follow-up are warranted to assess long-term outcomes.

Intercostal nerve cryoablation versus thoracic epidural analgesia for minimal invasive Nuss repair of pectus excavatum: a protocol for a randomised clinical trial (ICE trial).

INTRODUCTION: Epidural analgesia is currently considered the gold standard in postoperative pain management for the minimally invasive Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum. Alternative analgesic strategies (eg, patient-controlled analgesia and paravertebral nerve block) fail in accomplishing adequate prolonged pain management. Furthermore, the continuous use of opioids, often prescribed in addition to all pain management strategies, comes with side effects. Intercostal nerve cryoablation seems a promising novel technique. Hence, the primary objective of this study is to determine the impact of intercostal nerve cryoablation on postoperative length of hospital stay compared with standard pain management of young pectus excavatum patients treated with the minimally invasive Nuss procedure. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study protocol is designed for a single centre, prospective, unblinded, randomised clinical trial. Intercostal nerve cryoablation will be compared with thoracic epidural analgesia in 50 young pectus excavatum patients (ie, 12-24 years of age) treated with the minimally invasive Nuss procedure. Block randomisation, including stratification based on age (12-16 years and 17-24 years) and sex, with an allocation ratio of 1:1 will be performed.Postoperative length of hospital stay will be recorded as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include (1) pain intensity, (2) operative time, (3) opioid usage, (4) complications, including neuropathic pain, (5) creatine kinase activity, (6) intensive care unit admissions, (7) readmissions, (8) postoperative mobility, (9) health-related quality of life, (10) days to return to work/school, (11) number of postoperative outpatient visits and (12) hospital costs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol has been approved by the local Medical Ethics Review Committee, METC Zuyderland and Zuyd University of Applied Sciences. Participation in this study will be voluntary and informed consent will be obtained. Regardless of the outcome, the results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed international medical journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05731973.

Vacuum bell therapy for pectus excavatum: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Pectus excavatum, the most common chest wall deformity, is frequently treated with Nuss procedure. Here we will describe non-invasive procedure and analyze the variables associated vacuum bell therapy for patients with pectus excavatum. METHODS: Retrospective case-control study in a single center between July 2018 and February 2022, including patients with pectus excavatum treated with vacuum bell. Follow-up was continued to September 2022. The Haller index and Correction index was calculated before and after treatment to analysis the effectiveness of vacuum bell therapy. RESULTS: There were 98 patients enrolled in the treatment group, with 72 available for analysis, and the follow-up period ranged from 1.1 to 4.4 years (mean 3.3 years). When analyzing with the Haller Index, 18 patients (25.0%) showed excellent correction, 13 patients (18.1%) achieved good correction, and 4 patients (5.6%) had fair correction. The remaining patients had a poor outcome. Characteristics predicting a non-poor prognosis included initial age ≤ 11 years (OR = 3.94, p = 0.013) and patients with use over 24 consecutive months (OR = 3.95, p = 0.013). A total of 9 patients (12.5%) achieved a CI reduction below 10. Patients who started vacuum bell therapy at age > 11 had significantly less change compared to those who started at age ≤ 11 (P < 0.05). Complications included chest pain (5.6%), swollen skin (6.9%), chest tightness (1.4%) and erythema (15.3%). CONCLUSIONS: A certain percentage of patients with pectus excavatum can achieve excellent correction when treated with pectus excavatum therapy. Variables predicting better outcome including initial age ≤ 11 years both in HI and CI and vacuum bell use over 24 consecutive months in HI. In summary, pectus excavatum is an emerging non-invasive therapy for pectus excavatum and will be widely performed in a certain group of patients.

Body measurement changes in adults with pectus excavatum after the Nuss procedure: a study of 272 patients.

BACKGROUND: Pectus excavatum (PE) is the most common congenital abnormality of the chest wall. Most patients with PE have slim bodies. Some studies have been conducted on the physical growth of children and adolescents who underwent the Nuss procedure. This study aimed to evaluate body measurement changes in adult patients with PE after the Nuss procedure. METHODS: A total of 272 adult PE patients, who underwent the Nuss procedure and pectus bars removal from August 2014 to December 2020, were evaluated retrospectively. Body measurement [body height (BH), body weight (BW), and body mass index (BMI)] of the patients were collected before Nuss repair and after bar removal. We used the interquartile range (IQR) to identify and exclude outliers. Associations between changes in body measurement and clinical and radiological features were evaluated. RESULTS: The BH, BW and BMI showed significantly increased after pectus bar removal, compared to pre-Nuss procedure parameters (BH 173.8 ± 5.9 cm vs. 173.9 ± 5.9 cm, P < 0.001; BW 60.3 ± 8.1 kg vs. 61.1 ± 8.8 kg, P = 0.005; BMI 19.9 ± 2.2 kg/m2 vs. 20.1 ± 2.4 kg/m2, P = 0.02). The same result were observed in the male subgroup, the HI ≥ 4 group and the male subgroup within the HI ≥ 4 group. CONCLUSIONS: The BH, BW and BMI were significantly increased after completing surgical correction of PE using the Nuss procedure, particularly in young males and patients with more pronounced deformities.

Reliability and validity of the Chinese revised version of the pectus excavatum evaluation questionnaire in children with pectus excavatum.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to translate the Pectus Excavatum Evaluation Questionnaire(PEEQ) into Chinese, and to comprehensively assess subjective outcomes in quality of life of children with pectus excavatum. METHODS: The PEEQ was translated from English to Chinese as according to the PRO translation guidelines. Structural validity and reliability of the questionnaire were examined by validated factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha coefficient analysis respectively. RESULTS: The results of the validation factor analysis for the Chinese PEEQ parent's and child's questionnaires demonstrated that the fit indicators for each dimension met the required criteria. The overall Cronbach's alpha coefficient of parent's and child's questionnaires were 0.840 and 0.854. Both the item-level content validity index (I-CVI) and scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) of each sub-questionnaire were 1. CONCLUSION: The Chinese version of the PEEQ parent's questionnaire is suitable as a proxy assessment for patients with PE, but the child's questionnaire needs further adjustments.

Biomechanical Effectivity Evaluation of Single- and Double-Metal-Bar Methods with Rotation and Equilibrium Displacements in Nuss Procedure Simulations.

Surgical treatment of the pectus excavatum has led to the introduction of the Nuss procedure, a minimally invasive surgical procedure that involves inserting a metal bar under the sternum through a small lateral thoracic incision. An additional metal bar was inserted in patients with pectus excavatum to improve the retention of the restored chest wall after the Nuss procedure. However, a need still exists to analyze the mechanistic advantages and disadvantages of the double-bar method owing to the increased surgical time and proficiency. The purpose of this study is to compare and evaluate the efficiency of single- and double-bar methods using rotational and equilibrium displacement simulations of the Nuss procedure. A finite-element model was constructed for two types of metal bars inserted into the chest wall. Boundary conditions for the rotation and equilibrium displacements were set for the metal bar. The anterior sternal translation, Haller index and maximum equivalent stress and strain owing to the behavior of the metal bar were estimated and compared with the single-bar method and postoperatively acquired patient data. The simulation results showed that the influences of the intercostal muscle and equilibrium after rotation displacement were significant. The stresses and strains were distributed across the two metal bars, and the upper-metal bar was heavily loaded. The double-bar method was advantageous regarding the load distribution effects of the two metal bars on the chest wall. However, mechanical assessments are also important because an excessive load is typically applied to the upper-metal bar.

Outcomes After Pectus Excavatum Repair: Center Volume Matters.

PURPOSE: Pectus excavatum (Pectus) repair may be offered for those with significant cardiopulmonary compromise or severe cosmetic defects. The influence of hospital center volume on postoperative outcomes in children is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of children undergoing Pectus repair, stratified by hospital surgical volume. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmission Database was queried (2016-2020) for patients with Pectus (Q67.6). Patients were stratified into those who received repair at high-volume centers (HVCs; ≥20 repairs annually) versus low-volume centers (LVCs; <20 repairs annually). Demographics and outcomes were analyzed using standard statistical tests. RESULTS: A total of 9414 patients with Pectus underwent repair during the study period, with 69% treated at HVCs and 31% at LVCs. Patients at LVCs experienced higher rates of complications during index admission, including pneumothorax (23% vs. 15%), chest tube placement (5% vs. 2%), and overall perioperative complications (28% vs. 24%) compared to those treated at HVCs, all p < 0.001. Patients treated at LVCs had higher readmission rates within 30 days (3.8% vs. 2.8% HVCs) and overall readmission (6.8% vs. 4.7% HVCs), both p < 0.010. Among readmitted patients (n = 547), the most frequent complications during readmission for those initially treated at LVCs included pneumothorax/hemothorax (21% vs. 8%), bar dislodgment (21% vs. 12%), and electrolyte disorders (15% vs. 9%) compared to those treated at HVCs. CONCLUSION: Pediatric Pectus repair performed at high-volume centers was associated with fewer index complications and readmissions compared to lower-volume centers. Patients and surgeons should consider this hospital volume-outcome relationship. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective Comparative. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The implementation of a pectus bar insertion enhanced recovery after surgery pathway: A quality improvement initiative.

BACKGROUND: Pectus excavatum repair is associated with significant discomfort, and pain is a primary contributor to postoperative hospital length of stay. Recent advances in postoperative pain control include the use of intercostal cryoablation techniques that may now make it possible to discharge patients on the day of surgery. Unnecessary variation in patient care and noncompliance with care bundles may be a factor in extended length of stay. The global aim of this quality improvement initiative was to successfully implement an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway on patients undergoing pectus excavatum repair. The SMART aim was to have a greater than 70% compliance for the perioperative bundle elements within 1 year of the pathway implementation. METHODS: Multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were designed to create and implement an ERAS pathway for patients undergoing a pectus bar insertion procedure. This multidisciplinary pathway was designed, managed, and implemented with key stakeholders from the Departments of Evidence Based Practice, Surgery, Anesthesiology, and Perioperative Nursing. Patient characteristics, outcomes, and compliance with elements of the pathway were measured for analysis for both the baseline and post-intervention groups with monthly automated reports. RESULTS: After implementation of the ERAS pathway, data on the first 50 patients showed a 90% compliance with the perioperative bundle elements. Mean length of stay was significantly decreased from 33 h (95% CI [28.76, 37.31]) to 18 h (95% CI [14.54, 21.70]). There were zero readmissions within 24 hours for patients who were discharged on the day of surgery. CONCLUSION: Employing a multidisciplinary approach in both planning and execution that standardized clinician practices and minimized unnecessary variation in patient care, an ERAS pathway for pectus bar insertion has been successfully established at our institution.

Outcomes of the Nuss procedure in children with pectus excavatum: 14 years of experience.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the effectiveness of the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum (PE) and explore the impacts of sex and age on outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 594 consecutive children ≤18 years of age who underwent the thoracoscopy-assisted Nuss technique between January 2006 and July 2019. The severity of pectus deformity was calculated according to the Haller index (HI). The classification of PE and clinical data including complications was analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 594 patients, 456 (76.8%) were boys and 138 (23.2%) were girls. The mean age at surgery was 10.0 ± 5.0 years. The most common types of PE were 1A and 2A2 according to Park classification. Intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were 2/594 (0.3%) and 74/594 (12.5%), respectively. The most common complication was bar displacement. The bar was removed in 414 patients 3.5 ± 0.8 years later. The mean preoperative HI, postoperative HI with bar, and HI after bar removal were 4.2 ± 1.7, 2.4 ± 0.3, and 2.7 ± 0.5, respectively. Compared to the preoperative HI, both the postoperative HI with bar and HI after bar removal were significantly lower ( p < 0.001). For preschool-age children, the preoperative HI was significantly higher ( p = 0.027) and the change in HI significantly improved compared to school-age children ( p = 0.004). Boys and adolescents needed significantly more bars and stabilizers. CONCLUSION: Surgical correction of PE using the Nuss procedure is a safe procedure and improves the HI in children of different ages, even in those younger than 6 years of age.

Intercostal spinal nerve cryoablation for analgesia following pectus excavatum repair.

Pectus excavatum is a common chest wall deformity, most often treated during adolescence, that presents a significant postoperative pain control challenge for pediatric surgeons following surgical correction. The purpose of this article is to review the technique and outcomes of intercostal spinal nerve cryoablation for postoperative analgesia following surgical correction of pectus excavatum. Contemporary and historic literature were reviewed. Findings are summarized to provide a concise synopsis of the benefits of intercostal spinal nerve cryoablation relative to alternative analgesic modalities, as well as advocate for more widespread inclusion of this technique into multimodal pain regimens.

Use of magnets in pediatric surgery.

Since the 1970s, magnets have been progressively harnessed for use in minimally invasive treatment of pediatric surgical disease. In particular, multiple magnetic devices have been developed for treating esophageal atresia, pectus excavatum and scoliosis. These devices, which can be placed via small incisions or under endoscopic or fluoroscopic guidance, provide the added benefit of sparing patients multiple large, invasive procedures, and allowing for gradual correction of congenital anomalies over days to months, depending on the disease. In the following text, we detail the current landscape of magnetic devices used by pediatric surgeons, illustrate their use through clinical cases, and review the available body of literature with respect their outcomes and complications.

Non-surgical approaches to the management of chest wall deformities.

Chest wall deformities in children encompass a broad spectrum of disorders but pectus excavatum and carinatum are by far the most common. Treatment varies substantially by center, and depends on patient symptoms, severity of disease, and surgeon preference. Historically, surgical approaches were the mainstay of treatment for these disease processes but new advances in non-surgical approaches have demonstrated reasonable results in select patients. These non-surgical approaches include vacuum bell therapy, autologous fat grafting and hyaluronic acid injections for pectus excavatum, and orthotic brace therapy for pectus carinatum. There is debate with regards to optimal patient selection for these non-surgical approaches, as well as other barriers including reimbursement issues. This paper will review the current non-surgical approaches to chest wall deformities available, including optimal patient selection, treatment protocols, indications, contraindications, and outcomes.

Recent Advancements in Pectus Surgery: Crane Lifting, Multiple-Bar Approach, Bridge Stabilization, and Sandwich Technique.

PURPOSE: The most recent procedure for pectus excavatum repair involves crane-powered entire chest wall remodeling, which employs crane lifting, multiple-bar approach, bridge stabilization, and sandwich techniques. This resulted in a paradigm shift in pectus deformity repair from merely lifting the sunken bone to remodeling the chest wall into normal anatomy. METHODS: We analyzed 649 patients who underwent surgery for pectus excavatum or complex combined deformities between March 2018 and January 2022. A crane with sternal wiring or screwing was used to lift the chest wall without using the pectus bar turning power. Multiple bars with bridge connections were placed to eliminate bar displacement. Modified sandwich techniques were applied to relieve the lower coastal flare (flare-buster) and focal protuberance (magic string). RESULTS: The mean age of the patients included in the study was 12.2 years (range: 3-45 years). A single bar was used for 202 patients until 2021. For the multiple-bar technique, parallel bars (n = 142), crossbars (n = 166), and crossbars plus upper horizontal bars (XI pattern; n = 139) were used. The overall complication rate was 6.2 %. There was no cases of bar displacement were observed, but other minor complications such as pneumothorax (n = 20, 3.1 %), pleural effusion (n = 7, 1.1 %), and wound infection (n = 5, 0.8 %) were detected. Three patients required reoperation (infection, two: hemorrhage, one). CONCLUSIONS: The crane-powered entire chest wall remodeling technique improved the safety and comprehensiveness of the repair procedure. By incorporating bridge stabilization and the use of multiple bars, we effectively resolved the issues related to bar displacement and incomplete repair. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective Cohort Study.